So, when there is a conflict between the promotion of college sports and allegations of sexual assault, what's more likely to happen?
1. A thorough and non-biased investigation of the incident by individuals with an in-depth knowledge of the law, victims rights and the rights of the accused will occur.
2. A "sweep it under the rug" operation by school insiders designed to protect the sports program.
Call me crazy, but I think "2" is probably more likely. Heck, I even have an example: Penn State (and we see how well that one worked out).
Look, this isn't all that complicated. It's really not. If someone (be they male or female) makes an allegation of sexual assault on a college campus, the police need to be notified and they need to conduct an investigation. This would be an investigation that the school (including the athletic department) would be expected to completely cooperate with, for the record. That's it. No more.
We need to take school athletics, be they at the high school or college level, down a peg or five, as the glorification of athletics leads to glory for a small few, but ultimately can harm the many. These sporting activities are, after all, just entertainment for everyone except for those who play.
Post a Comment