Do I just completely ignore it? The drawback to that is it denies me some decent content.
Do I publish and mock it? I don't like that option for two reasons:
- It just encourages the writer(s).
- Despite a desire to respond on my part, I really don't want to be brought down to that level of negativity.
"...it will be the last thing your liberal ass can post on the #### internet. on "
(Just a snippet, and with the swear word redacted by yours truly.)
Again, what to do? I could very well republish the posting that offended "Anonymous" (they are always anonymous, by the way) on spite, but why the heck should that person get to decide what I write here? My $10/year, my content decisions. Besides, again, why give in to that level of negativity?
Maybe what I should do is simply say the following:
* * * * * *
Dear Anonymous and Offended Reader,
You do realize that your comment was directed at a blog posting, right? Maybe you thought I was somehow affiliated with a real news organization. Sorry to disappoint, but I'm just a schlub who likes to write and this is the Internet, home to a billion cat videos. That's it. I'm not making public policy here, and in point of fact I don't take much of what I write here seriously, so why do you? Life is too short.
Here's my advice to you: Channel that anger into something more productive, like whittling or playing Neopets. And for God's sake, if you're going to threaten me, please at least use your real name, if for no other reason than the fact that "Cletus" is easier for me to spell than "Anonymous".
Best Wishes for a Joyous Holiday Season,
p.s. - I still don't think there is much in the way of difference between the Confederate battle flag and the swastika.